My Bookmarks on Science & Technology, Climate Change, Astrobiology, Genetics, Evolution

April 6, 2010 – Original Source: Yahoo Green

Melting glaciers have become a well-known symbol of climate change.

Why? “It’s one of the simplest indicators of climate change,” says Eric Rignot, a senior research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and a professor at the University of California, Irvine. “Glaciers melt when temperatures are increasing. It’s just basic physics.”

We also have access to numerous images of disappearing glaciers. Yet sometimes it’s hard to know exactly what the pictures are showing.

Below are some of the best photos that glaciologists say illustrate what they are seeing — a worldwide retreat in glaciers due to warming temperatures. The photos represent what is happening both in an individual glacier and in the various regions around the world.

“You don’t need to be a scientist to appreciate the magnitude of change of these glaciers,” says Rignot. “There shouldn’t be any doubt about these images.”

Left: Summer 1938. Right: Summer 2005. (Photo: U.S. Geological Survey)
Grinnell Glacier, Glacier National Park, Montana

These photos accurately reflect what is happening at Grinnell Glacier, which has been reduced by nearly 90 percent over the past century, and elsewhere in Glacier National Park, according to glaciologists. “When Glacier National Park was formed back in 1912 there were 100 glaciers in the park,” says Lonnie Thompson, a professor at the Ohio State University. “This year there are 26 glaciers, and those are expected to disappear within the next 30 years.”

August 1941. (Photo: U.S. Geological Survey)

August 2004. (Photo: US Geological Survey)
Muir Glacier, Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, Alaska

Some of the largest glacial losses are happening in Alaska. Glaciologists say the above photos reflect real change that is taking place. “Alaskan glaciers are really shrinking a lot,” according to Marco Tedesco, an assistant professor at the City College of New York. “There is no debate about Muir Glacier. It’s a dramatic change to liquid water.”

Left: Summer 1917. Right: Summer 2005. (Photo: The Glacier Photograph Collection, National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center  for Glaciology.)
Pedersen Glacier, Kenai Fjords National Park, Alaska

Pedersen Glacier is another example of the massive glacial retreat taking place in Alaska. Glaciologists like the above photos because they are taken from the same spot and the perspective is the same.

Left: July 1978. Right: July 2004. (Photo: Glacier Photograph Collection of the National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology.)
Qori Kalis Glacier, Peru

Professor Lonnie Thompson  has been mapping the retreat of Qori Kalis Glacier up the valley since 1978. In fact, he took the photo on the right. “In our first 15 years of observation it was retreating at a rate of 6 meters per year and in the last 15 years it’s been averaging 60 meters per year,” says Thompson. “It is the world’s largest tropical ice cap and it has lost about 25 percent of its area since we started observing it.”

(Photo: NASA) Jakobshavn Isbrae, Greenland

Glaciologists agree that Jakobshavn is a good example of what’s happening with glaciers because it has a longer record than most glaciers. There is data going back as far as 1850. Jakobshavn was retreating slowly for a long time, but then in 2000 the glacier started retreating much more rapidly.

What’s more, three of the biggest glaciers in Greenland changed dramatically in the same time period, according to Leigh Stearns, an assistant professor at the University of Kansas. “These glaciers are really dynamic and they are changing much faster than we thought ice sheet glaciers could change,” she says.


Comments on: "Images of disappearing glaciers" (9)

  1. Karl Wende said:

    The photos don’t leave much to comment upon.
    Climate change is real- and we haven’t even seen the real consequences yet…
    Ice Ages have come and gone before- why would it be different now?

    • novascience said:

      It is different, because condition, in which it happening, are different. Also now there is civilization on Earth with it’s industry and pollution.

  2. Karl Wende said:

    That doesn’t change the facts, but if you believe that humans are to blame for the total climate change, then you’re wrong.
    When did we have the last total climate change? If you ask different scientists, you’ll get different answers- there are no agreements, and if there would be an (agreed) agreemnts, there would be no proof- just unverified statements.

  3. Karl Wende said:

    Yes- the events are known, but not the time between them.
    In any case- we have always had, and will always have, climate changes without human interventions.
    The condition of our air might not be the best anymore (like our water) due to the influences of our negligent industries, but that would not cause a global climate change- but our Star Clock will.
    By the way- what happened to the “commercialized” danger of the holes in the ozonlayer? Has it repaired itself…?

    • novascience said:

      And events are known, and time between them, and the reasons. That’s why this climate change is known as different.

  4. Karl Wende said:

    Yes-different times with different reasons for a climat change.
    So, what would be the reason (s) for the present climate change?

  5. Karl Wende said:

    Hi, and thank you for the link, which I will have a look at.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: